To get properly immersed in a 4-D IMAX Rohrian theo-phanic adventure, one needs a set of 3-D lenses, which implicitly provide Rohr’s indispensable theo-logic vision.
“Of a hundred writers who have held Duns Scotus up to ridicule, not two of them have ever read him and not one of them has understood him.” ~ Etienne Gilson
Perhaps the same could be said of Richard Rohr?
Occasionally, it does seem to be the case that his Franciscan, Scotistic sensibilities, which have long yielded minority — not unorthodox — reports, leave him misunderstood, and …
precisely by those who, only having engaged him sparingly, have engaged him superficially, thus rashly judging him, even while stridently recommending to others that he best go unread!
Those who fail to trade-in their hermeneutically polarized theo-logical shades before entering Rohr’s perichoretic theater will not only find his motion picture of our relationship to the Trinity blurry, but might feel theologically poked, jolted and shaken in their seats from a lack of that hermeneutical context, which otherwise allows his imagery to theophanically stoke, ignite and fire-up others of us!
Rohr’s hermeneutic — not only neither blurs nor ignores, but — manifestly employs very robust notions regarding identity (strict and nonstrict), separability and distinction.
For those searching for his onto-theo-logical, trinito-logical model, it’s not articulated explicitly in The Divine Dance, which explicates Rohr’s theo-poetic, trinito-phanic imagery. But it is nevertheless implicated and rather pervasively!
This is to recognize that Rohr’s mystical imagery has always most certainly represented a trans-rational, trans-apophatic, experiential and relational over-flow and precisely from the rational, kataphatic-apophatic, modalities with which they confluently stream, existentially model-ing the doctrinal and liturgical continuities, which they theo-phanically transcend but do not theo-logically transgress.
Rohr employs a robustly relational Hermeneutic of Presence:
We encounter Rohr’s Implicit Hermeneutic (Scotistic & Palamatic) of Presence vis a vis the ways he addresses:
Incarnation (Christological & panentheistic) and
Eucharist (people gathered, word proclaimed & sacred species), which then onto-theo-logically extends to the
Trinity (perichoretic), trinito–logically, for those searching for his model, which takes:
essence as ousia
persons as hypostaseis
energies as energeiai
eucharist as christ’s transfigured, life-giving, but still human, body, en-hypostasized in the Logos and penetrated with divine energies
participation, as methexis — not partaking of divine essence, but — partaking of met-ousia
metousiosis as a multifaceted presence that involves
semiotic (sign and symbol),
dynamical (efficacious via divine power and activity),
penetrative (indwelling) and
distinct (essentially, conceptually, adequately, formally and/or modally) realities.
None of this is to claim that such a hermeneutic is either unproblematic or uncontroversial, only that, at least in Catholic circles — Anglican, Orthodox and Roman — it is not unorthodox. I don’t see why it would necessarily be incompatible in Arminian, Wesleyan or other traditions. Indeed, many of its elements can foster ecumenical and interreligious dialogue across all of our great traditions, East and West, pneumatologically, panentheistically and polydoxically!
theo-phanic, Duns Scotus, Etienne Gilson, Richard Rohr, Scotistic sensibilities, perichoretic, strict identity, nonstrict identity, separability, onto-theo-logical, trinito-logical model, Divine Dance, theo-poetic, trinito-phanic trans-rational, trans-apophatic, kataphatic, apophatic, Hermeneutic of Presence, Scotistic, Palamatic, Incarnation, Christological, Eucharist, people gathered, word proclaimed, sacred species, onto-theo-logically, Trinity, trinito–logical, essence, ousia, hypostaseis, energeiai, en-hypostasized, divine energies, methexis, met-ousia, metousiosis, semiotic, divine indwelling), essential distinction, conceptual distinction, adequate distinction, formal distinction, modal distinction, mike morrell, polydoxy, ecumenical dialogue, interreligious dialogue