Skip to content

PARTICIPATING in the DIVINE DANCE

  • A 12 Step Contemplative Spirituality
  • That All Shall Be Saved by David Bentley Hart – how (and why) anyone might profitably engage it!

Protected: Responses to Criticisms of Rohr & Morrell’s Divine Dance

Protected: Responses to Criticisms of Rohr & Morrell’s Divine Dance

February 1, 2019February 1, 2019 John Sobert Sylvest

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Related

Posted in Uncategorized

Post navigation

Previous postproperly locating impasses in theological stances
Next postHow Scotus Might Gift Zizioulas Coherence

Recent Posts

  • Trading the insanity of our Bayesian priors for the wisdom of the Benedictine priors
  • The Turn to the Subject, who Participates – in defense of both immediate & mediated virtually unconditioned knowledge
  • God’s got nothing to do with death or gratuitous evil
  • Hypostatic Logic from the Capps, Cyril & Maximus to Bonaventure & Scotus – or why a Franciscan, Neo-chalcedonian Cosmotheandrism
  • “Samenesses & differences in relation” reduce to Sophianic I-Thou-nesses

Recent Comments

Universalism –… on God Ordains Epistemic Distanci…
The Maximian Logos-l… on Sophia, Energies & Logoi i…
The Summer of Love:… on A Collatio in Response to Edwa…
A Collatio in Respon… on The Summer of Love: Feser-Hart…
Raphael on A Collatio in Response to Edwa…

Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • January 2020
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • March 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • May 2016

Categories

  • interreligious dialogue
  • metaphysics
  • moral philosophy
  • music and poetry
  • philosophical theology
  • political theology
  • Pope Francis
  • religious epistemology
  • science & religion
  • spirituality
  • systematic theology
  • systematic theophany
  • theodicy
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Trading the insanity of our Bayesian priors for the wisdom of the Benedictine priors
  • The Turn to the Subject, who Participates – in defense of both immediate & mediated virtually unconditioned knowledge
  • God’s got nothing to do with death or gratuitous evil
  • Hypostatic Logic from the Capps, Cyril & Maximus to Bonaventure & Scotus – or why a Franciscan, Neo-chalcedonian Cosmotheandrism
  • “Samenesses & differences in relation” reduce to Sophianic I-Thou-nesses

Recent Comments

Universalism –… on God Ordains Epistemic Distanci…
The Maximian Logos-l… on Sophia, Energies & Logoi i…
The Summer of Love:… on A Collatio in Response to Edwa…
A Collatio in Respon… on The Summer of Love: Feser-Hart…
Raphael on A Collatio in Response to Edwa…

Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • January 2020
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • March 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • May 2016

Categories

  • interreligious dialogue
  • metaphysics
  • moral philosophy
  • music and poetry
  • philosophical theology
  • political theology
  • Pope Francis
  • religious epistemology
  • science & religion
  • spirituality
  • systematic theology
  • systematic theophany
  • theodicy
  • Uncategorized
Create a website or blog at WordPress.com